دفترچه

sonixax نوشته: بیش از 100 میلیون کشته

Russell نوشته: Shut Up Fallacy

مزدك بامداد نوشته: شبکه امریکایی "ان بی سی" به نقل از "ون وی ‌پو" روزنامه چاپ هونگ کنگ مدعی شد..
بیجاست، آگاه نیستید که هنگ کنگ چند سالی است که بخشی از چین است ولی
بگونه ی جدا سر و با کمترین دستیازی کشور چین مادر، گردانندگی میشود!

نقل قول:

Wen Wei Po is regarded as a newspaper that supports the Communist Party of China and the People's Republic of China government. Consequently, the reports are mainly on the "brighter" and the more positive side of China.

مزدك بامداد نوشته: پس از کتک خوردن،به دامان پاپاجون پناه برد.!

مزدك بامداد نوشته: we attack his right to make such a claim!

نقل قول:

When force or the threat of force is used to suppress the arguments of one side in a debate, that is a type of one-sidedness. Governments are always tempted to use police powers to prevent criticism of their policies, and totalitarian governments are frequently successful in doing so. Extremists use threats or actual violence to silence those who argue against them. Audience members "shout down" a debater whom they disagree with in order to prevent a case from being heard. This is, unfortunately, common enough to qualify as a logical fallacy.

However, force or the threat of it is not an argument, which means that appealing to force is not a logical fallacy. Since hitting someone over the head with a stick is not an argument at all, a fortiori it is not a fallacious one. However, withholding relevant information can lead people into drawing false conclusions.

sonixax نوشته: باز هم ربطش به کره جنوبی چیست ؟
البته :

Wen Wei Po - WiKi


زور بیخود میزنید جانم!

Russell نوشته: درست میگویید !!



[ATTACH=CONFIG]3446[/ATTACH]
Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Force

Russell نوشته: When force or the threat of force is used to suppress the arguments of one side in a debate, that is a type of one-sidedness. Governments are always tempted to use police powers to prevent criticism of their policies, and totalitarian governments are frequently successful in doing so. Extremists use threats or actual violence to silence those who argue against them. Audience members "shout down" a debater whom they disagree with in order to prevent a case from being heard. This is, unfortunately, common enough to qualify as a logical fallacy.

However, force or the threat of it is not an argument, which means that appealing to force is not a logical fallacy. Since hitting someone over the head with a stick is not an argument at all, a fortiori it is not a fallacious one. However, withholding relevant information can lead people into drawing false conclusions.

Mehrbod نوشته: تازه شما خود اتان را زده‌اید به آن راه یا براستی در کوچه علی چپ هستید؟ اینجا سخنگاه است و کسی باتوم دست اش نگرفته و سخن از
"باید و نباید" هم در تراز اندیشیک میباشد, اگرنه روشنه کسی نخواسته سرمایه‌دارها گفتند "کمونیست بده" اخراج شود یا با او برخورد شود!

مزدك بامداد نوشته: we attack his right to make such a claim!

مزدك بامداد نوشته: پس از کتک خوردن،به دامان پاپاجون پناه برد.!

Mehrbod نوشته: جایی در میان آن سفسته‌ها, سفسته‌یِ «بنمایه‌یِ انگلیسی آوردم پس سخن من درسته», نیامده؟

نقل قول:Source:

David Hackett Fischer, Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (Harper & Row, 1970), pp. 294-296.

Resource:

John Woods, "Appeal to Force", from Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by Hans V. Hanson and Robert C. Pinto (Penn State Press, 1995), pp. 240-250

نقل قول:About the Author: Gary N. Curtis

I have a doctoral degree in philosophy from Indiana University in Bloomington, where I majored in logic. My dissertation concerned the concept of logical form, and touched on the subject of formal fallacies. I have taught philosophy and logic at both the undergraduate and graduate levels at I.U.B., Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis—known affectionately as "Ooey-Pooey"—and Indiana State University. For five years, I worked as an ontologist for the artificial intelligence company Cycorp, Inc. in Austin, Texas. More recently, I've done consulting work for an online critical thinking textbook, and a television show which, unfortunately, never aired.
Comments and suggestions on these files are welcome. I am particularly interested in real-life examples of fallacious arguments drawn from the media, and will consider for inclusion fallacies that are not yet listed in the files. If you know of any external resources that these files should link to, please let me know of them. All suggestions or submissions that I use will be duly acknowledged. I will assume that all email is intended for publication, unless notified to the contrary. If you wish to have your name withheld, please inform me to that effect in the email

مزدك بامداد نوشته: زور بیخود میزنید جانم!
بیجاست، سخنگوی کشور چین نیست!
روزنامه ی Bild هنگ کنگ است!
خود واشنگتن پست که کمونیست هم نیست
نوشته فزاده گویی کرده اند. شاه بخشیده
ولی شاهقلی نمیبخشد!

Russell نوشته: have a doctoral degree in philosophy from Indiana University in Bloomington,

Russell نوشته: پس از کتک خوردن،به دامان پاپاجون پناه برد.!