sonixax نوشته: ثابت نشد چون دادگاه بیطرف نبود آنارشی جان .
دلیل اینکه حکومت میره زیر سوال اینه که در یک دادگاه نا عادلانه موارد بررسی شده .
اینکه راننده طرف رو ندیده حرف مفت و دروغه . بولدوزر باید دید کافی و کامل روی زمین روبرو داشته باشه تا بتونه درست خاک برداری کنه . مساله بعدی که در دادگاه بهش اشاره شده بود این بود که نیروهای نظامی گفته بودن کسی جلو نره این خودش رفته تو چس مقصر خودشه !

‭BBC ‮فارسی‬ - ‮جهان‬ - ‮دولت اسرائیل 'در مرگ راشل کوری مقصر نیست'‬

وقتی اسرائیلی‌ها کوری را ندیدند+تصاویر - مشرق نیوز | mashreghnews.ir

خوب با این استدلال از فردا هر کسی که پرید توی خیابان جلوی ماشین با سرعت هر چه تمام تر بکوبیم بهش چون همه میگویند نپرید وسط خیابان و از جاهایی که مشخص شده از خیابان رد بشید ! تازه اینجا یک برتری هم داریم اون هم اینه که این قانون هم هست .

سوای همه اینها ، اصلن درست طرف این دختر رو ندیده ! کجای دنیا اگر شما یک نفر رو زیر بگیرید به خاطر اینکه ندیدیدش تبرئه میشید ؟! اگر داستان برعکس بود چه میشد ؟!

نقل قول:

The IDF produced a video about Corrie's death that includes footage taken from inside the cockpit of a D9. The video makes a "credible case", wrote Joshua Hammer in Mother Jones, that "the operators, peering out through narrow, double-glazed, bulletproof windows, their view obscured behind pistons and the giant scooper, might not have seen Corrie kneeling in front of them".[SUP][10][/SUP]

نقل قول:

The court ruled against Corrie's family on August 28, 2012. In a 62-page verdict, the judge ruled that Corrie's death was an accident for which she was responsible, and absolved the IDF of any wrongdoing.[SUP][3][/SUP][SUP][84][/SUP][SUP][85][/SUP] According to the judge "The mission of the IDF force on the day of the incident was solely to clear the ground.... The mission did not include, in any way, the demolition of homes."[SUP][86][/SUP][SUP][87][/SUP] The court invoked the principle of the combatant activities exception, as the IDF was attacked in the same area where Corrie was killed a few hours earlier; that Corrie could have avoided the danger and that defendants were not at fault as there was neither intent nor negligence involved in her death.[SUP][3][/SUP] Judge Oded Gershon said that the IDF did not violate Corrie's right to life because Corrie had placed herself in a dangerous situation, that Israel's investigation was appropriate and did not contain mistakes, and also criticized the U.S. government for failing to send a diplomatic representative to observe Corrie's autopsy.[SUP][88][/SUP] Gershon said: "I rule unequivocally that the claim that the deceased was intentionally hit by the bulldozer is totally baseless. This was an extremely unfortunate accident.[SUP][85][/SUP] I reached the conclusion that there was no negligence on the part of the bulldozer driver. I reject the suit. There is no justification to demand the state pay any damages. She [Corrie] did not distance herself from the area, as any thinking person would have done. She consciously put herself in harm's way."

Furthermore, Gershon pointed to three different entry bans, and also pointed out that the Philadelphi route was effectively a war zone and was formally declared a closed military zone when Corrie died. Gershon also noted that the United States had issued an Israel travel advisory warning to avoid Gaza and the West Bank. In addition, Gershon said that the ISM "abuses the human rights discourse to blur its actions which are de facto violence" and specialized in disrupting IDF activity, which "included an army of activists serving as 'human shields' for terrorists wanted by Israeli security forces, financial and logistical aid to Palestinians including terrorists and their families, and disruption of the sealing of suicide bombers' houses".[SUP][89][/SUP] The Corrie family laywer, Hussein Abu Hussein, said they were "now studying our options", in regards to a possible appeal.[SUP][90][/SUP]

While rejecting the Corrie family's claims to damages, the judge also waived the Corrie family's court costs.Haifa District Court spokeswoman Nitzan Eyal said that her family could appeal the ruling. The amount sought was a symbolic US$1 and legal costs.